<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Science in Reading</title>
  <link>https://scienceinreading.org/</link>
  <description>Research and reading science, made clear</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:52:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://scienceinreading.org/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>After the Alphabetic Code: How Comprehension Grows in Subject Classrooms</title>
    <link>https://scienceinreading.org/after-the-alphabetic-code-comprehension-subject-classrooms/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://scienceinreading.org/after-the-alphabetic-code-comprehension-subject-classrooms/</guid>
    <description>Phonics is necessary but not sufficient. This article examines the evidence on vocabulary, background knowledge, inference and cognitive load, and considers what it means for reading science texts in UK primary and secondary classrooms.</description>
    <author>Science in Reading</author>
    <category>Reading Science</category>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 21:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>When the Chatbot Summarises: AI Reading Support and the Limits of Helpful Struggle</title>
    <link>https://scienceinreading.org/when-chatbot-summarises-ai-reading-support-science-classroom/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://scienceinreading.org/when-chatbot-summarises-ai-reading-support-science-classroom/</guid>
    <description>AI tools can read aloud, simplify and summarise science texts, but what cognitive work do they remove? This balanced feature weighs the evidence for struggling readers against the risk of bypassing the productive struggle that builds comprehension.</description>
    <author>Science in Reading</author>
    <category>Comment &amp; Debate</category>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 21:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>